Hướng dẫn viết Argumentative Essay trong IELTS Writing Part 2 chi tiết nhất kèm Essay Sample

Đề bài: Some people suggest that the government should spend money putting more works of art like paintings and statues into towns and cities to make them attractive places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that more artworks should be placed in towns and cities to enhance their attractiveness. I completely agree with this suggestion, as the integration of art into public spaces contributes to tourism, social well-being, and cultural enrichment.

Critics often argue that allocating public funds to art installations in urban areas is impractical due to limited budgets and pressing priorities, asserting that non-essential amenities should not be prioritized. However, I believe this is a narrow perspective. Featuring art installations in public spaces enhances their visual appeal and therefore draws more visitors. The resulting increased tourism can generate substantial revenue, often exceeding the initial investment. This financially justifies the investment in public art.

In addition to the economic benefits, public art can yield positive social implications. Firstly, it significantly contributes to social well-being since public areas featuring arts are more likely to be used for community events and social interactions. For instance, the Vietnam Festival of Creativity and Design in 2023, a government-sponsored cultural event, has drawn over two hundred thousand people to visit and engage with the artworks, spend quality time with their families, and meet new people. These relationships help to foster emotional well-being, thereby enhancing the quality of life. Secondly, art in public spaces serves as a medium for cultural expression with sculptures, art installations, and paintings reflecting the history, values, and identity of a community. For that reason, investing in public art from different backgrounds helps to promote cultural diversity.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that governments should allocate resources to introduce more works of art into towns and cities. Despite concerns about financial constraints, public art can boost the local economy, improve the quality of life, and foster cultural diversity.

Đề bài: Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that the government spending on maintaining and renovating old buildings is excessive, and historic structures should be demolished to make room for modern ones. I completely disagree with this idea.

The argument in favor of constructing new buildings would be that older ones, presumed to require high maintenance costs, are no longer functional for their intended use and, therefore, should be replaced. However, this is a very shortsighted view. Reusing and repurposing existing structures uses less energy and raw materials than building new ones, resulting in lower costs. Once restored to its original glory, a historical building will likely be better, more sustainable, and more cost-effective than its modern counterpart. Furthermore, buildings created in the 20th century, for example, were often made of more durable materials that can withstand harsh weather conditions, and the fact that many still stand is a testament to the skills and craftsmanship of our ancestors.

However, the most compelling reason the authorities should preserve old buildings is that they often embody the history, heritage, and cultural identity of a community. These buildings capture a moment in history and serve as a powerful reminder of our connection to the past. Demolishing an old building or simply letting it fall into disrepair could mean a piece of our history is lost forever. Additionally, heritage buildings often possess unique agricultural features that can not be replicated in modern constructions. They contribute to a city’s visual appeal and intricacy, adding character to its urban landscape. Even seemingly unremarkable buildings could hide a wealth of architectural details that could tell us a lot about bygone eras.

In conclusion, every effort should be made to protect historic structures from urbanization and threats of destruction as they hold immense cultural and aesthetic values.